{rfName}
Do

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

4

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Ubalde-Lopez, MAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Do birthrates contribute to sickness absence differences in women? A cohort study in Catalonia, Spain, 2012-2014

Publicated to:Plos One. 15 (8 August): e0237794- - 2020-08-26 15(8 August), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237794

Authors: March, AN; Villar, R; Ubalde-Lopez, M; Benavides, FG; Serra, L

Affiliations

Barcelona Inst Global Hlth ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain - Author
CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ, Madrid, Spain - Author
IMIM Parc Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Girona, Res Grp Stat Econometr & Hlth GRECS, Girona, Spain - Author
Univ Pompeu Fabra, Ctr Res Occupat Hlth, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords
Abdominal painAbsenteeismAdultAgeAge distributionAge factorsBirth rateBleedingCataloniaCohort analysisCohort studiesControlled studyDisease registryEmployment statusFemaleFemale workerHealthHumanHumansIncidenceJob adjustmentLeaveLifeLow back painMaleMaternal ageMedical leaveMiddle agedMorning sicknessPelvic painPregnancyPregnancy complicationPregnancy complicationsRegisterRegistriesReproductive behaviorReviewSick leaveSpainTrend studyWomen's healthWork

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Plos One due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Multidisciplinary. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-05-20:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 1
  • Europe PMC: 1
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-20:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 24.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 24 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.